Curator

Curator Reveals Detailed Architecture of Its Network Filtering System After October 2026 Outage

Curator published a technical post-mortem analyzing the 38-minute outage that affected its entire traffic filtering network on October 8, 2026. The company operates nine filtering sites across Russia, each containing multiple nodes connected via high-performance switches to upstream providers. Traffic is isolated using two VRF contexts—external for inbound dirty traffic and internal for cleaned traffic—ensuring sequential processing through the protection system. Each node runs a custom Linux kernel firewall and a watchdog service that monitors BGP sessions to detect failures and remove unhealthy nodes from rotation. Centralized configuration management via CControl allows rapid rollout of rules but also introduces systemic risk when faulty changes propagate across all nodes. The post-mortem emphasizes the need for isolation, staged deployments, and independent recovery mechanisms in large-scale filtering infrastructures.

Avanpost Launches Identity Cloud Service, CURATOR Becomes First Partner

Avanpost has begun commercial operation of its Identity Cloud platform, a subscription-based service for multi-factor authentication and single sign-on aimed at employees and contractors. The service removes the need for heavy on-premises IAM deployments by allowing organizations to adopt cloud identity protection through flexible subscription plans. CURATOR became the first partner to roll out the platform, offering it under the CURATOR.IDENTITY brand. Four tariff tiers are available, ranging from basic Start to the upcoming Zero Trust package that includes device verification and continuous trust assessment. Each customer receives an isolated environment with its own database, while Access Bridge keeps infrastructure secrets on-premises and supports offline authentication during connectivity loss. Partners can either resell the Avanpost service or deploy the platform in their own infrastructure and sell it under their own branding.

How to Properly Compare CDNs: TTFB, p95 Latency, Caching, DDoS Protection and True Pricing

Selecting a CDN based solely on the number of points of presence is as unreliable as choosing a car by dashboard buttons. Networks with dozens of global PoPs may underperform for audiences concentrated in Novosibirsk or Yekaterinburg, while smaller regional providers often deliver superior peering with Russian operators. The article evaluates CDNVideo, EdgeCenter, Curator, NGENIX and Yandex Cloud CDN across verifiable features, network design, caching behavior, security controls, operations and commercial models. Performance data is separated because marketing claims cannot substitute for independent measurements from services such as CDNMON. Emphasis is placed on p95 metrics, cache hit ratios, origin shielding, raw logs and API limits rather than marketing scores. The analysis shows that no single universal ranking exists; optimal choice depends on traffic profile, audience geography, security requirements and operational workflows.