Russia's Top Investigator Proposes AI, VPN and Other Technologies as Aggravating Circumstances in Criminal Code

Alexander Bastrykin, head of Russia's Investigative Committee, has put forward a bill that would treat the use of artificial intelligence, VPN services and other information technologies as an aggravating factor when sentencing offenders. The proposal aims to address the growing role of digital tools in crimes ranging from fraud and data trafficking to terrorism, murder and sexual offences. Current Russian law lacks a universal provision allowing courts to factor in the deployment of such technologies during punishment decisions. Bastrykin argued that embedding specific technologies into dozens of Criminal Code articles would be inefficient because the IT landscape evolves too rapidly for static legal language. Instead, the committee advocates a systemic approach that recognises technology as a distinct aggravating circumstance when it serves as the primary instrument of the crime or significantly amplifies the harm caused. The measure would not criminalise the mere possession or activation of a VPN, smartphone or AI model; it would apply only when these tools materially enable or scale criminal activity. The bill has already been prepared by the Investigative Committee and was outlined in an interview with Interfax.

AntiMalwareTranslated from Russian

Read at source

Alexander Bastrykin, Chairman of the Investigative Committee of Russia, has proposed amending the Criminal Code to classify the use of artificial intelligence, VPN services and other information technologies as an aggravating circumstance in criminal cases.

The committee has already drafted the corresponding bill, Bastrykin told Interfax. At present, the Criminal Code contains no universal norm that would allow courts to take into account the application of such tools when determining punishment.

According to Bastrykin, these technologies are increasingly helping offenders achieve their objectives, from fraud and illegal circulation of personal data to terrorism, murder and sexual offences.

The head of the Investigative Committee considers it ineffective to insert separate references to AI, proxy servers and similar tools into dozens of individual articles of the Criminal Code. By the time legislators list specific technologies, the IT sector will have changed several times and the wording will have become outdated.

Instead, the committee advocates a systemic solution: recognising the use of technology as a standalone aggravating factor. The new provision would apply only when the technology served as the principal instrument of the crime or enabled a substantial increase in the harm inflicted, for example by scaling cyber fraud or organising the illegal trade in personal data.

Bastrykin emphasised that the measure would not punish citizens for simply having a VPN enabled, carrying a smartphone or running a neural network on their computer. The norm is intended solely for situations in which digital tools materially facilitate or intensify criminal activity.

Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest

More in Policy & Regulation

Russian Minister Proposes Blocking All SIM Cards Linked to Fraudsters Banned in MAX Messenger
Russia Ready to Disclose Source Code of Social Networks, Messengers and AI Models
Russia Mulls Mandatory Two-Week IMEI Registration for Foreign Smartphones via Gosuslugi