From Hundreds of Alerts to Proven Vulnerabilities: INFERA AI.SafeCode Unifies Seven Scanners into a Single DevSecOps Pipeline

INFERA AI.SafeCode integrates seven distinct security scanners into one continuous analysis platform that automatically validates findings instead of flooding teams with unconfirmed alerts. The solution combines SAST, SCA, Secrets detection, DAST, AI-driven Pentest agents, Code Fuzzing, and API Fuzzing to deliver proof-of-exploit evidence for high-risk issues. By cross-validating results across engines, the platform reduces false positives and provides developers with actionable tasks that include reproduction steps, stack traces, and one-click AutoFix recommendations directly inside IDEs and Git workflows. Special attention is given to AI-generated code from tools such as GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude, ensuring that rapid development does not introduce unvetted vulnerabilities. The system also maps full attack surfaces, tracks reachability from entry points to vulnerable sinks, and supports compliance requirements including FSTEC orders for critical information infrastructure. MLSecOps capabilities extend coverage to machine-learning pipelines, model configurations, and inference APIs. Overall, INFERA shifts AppSec from reactive alert triage to measurable risk management with clear MTTR metrics and SLA tracking.

HabrTranslated from Russian

Read at source

INFERA AI.SafeCode addresses the growing crisis in Application Security where traditional integration of separate SAST, DAST, and SCA tools produces hundreds of critical alerts, up to 80 percent of which are false positives.

The rapid adoption of AI coding assistants such as GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude has multiplied both development speed and the volume of insecure code, turning AppSec into a bottleneck when legacy processes remain unchanged.

INFERA AI.SafeCode unites seven specialized engines under a single DevSecOps and MLSecOps framework: real-time SAST in IDE and CI/CD, SCA for open-source components and transitive dependencies, Secrets scanning with validity verification, DAST for running applications, an AI Pentest agent that simulates manual testing in a sandbox, Code Fuzzing for crash vulnerabilities, and API Fuzzing covering REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket interfaces.

Results are normalized and deduplicated into a unified risk registry that automatically assigns high and critical issues to developers together with explanations, proof-of-exploit evidence, and remediation guidance.

Cross-validation between engines replaces manual triage. When SAST identifies a potential SQL injection, the platform automatically builds a targeted fuzzing harness; Code Fuzzing then attempts exploitation and returns a conclusive stack trace only if a crash occurs. Similarly, DAST detects authorization flaws such as IDOR by comparing responses across roles, after which the AI Pentest agent constructs attack graphs up to twelve steps deep to determine whether the issue can escalate to remote code execution.

Security checks run continuously inside the IDE, highlighting problems before commit and offering concrete AutoFix patches. Integration with GitLab and GitHub posts comments and ready pull requests directly on affected lines, while vibe-coded AI output is validated to prevent hallucinated vulnerabilities from entering the codebase.

API Fuzzing exercises stateful scenarios including authentication flows, mass assignment, JWT bypass, and malformed payloads using specifications such as OpenAPI, GraphQL schema, and .proto files. SCA analysis links vulnerable dependencies to actual code paths, distinguishing reachable CVEs from unused libraries, which is especially critical for organizations subject to Russian critical infrastructure regulations.

Secrets detection distinguishes test tokens from valid production credentials by performing live verification, converting potential noise into immediate incidents that trigger key revocation and investigation.

A centralized project view aggregates repositories, scan histories, attack-surface data, and metrics such as MTTR and SLA violations. The attack-surface module visualizes subdomains, open ports, endpoints, and entry-to-sink chains, giving CISO, AppSec, and development teams a shared, real-time picture of organizational risk.

Self-hosted deployment supports strict enterprise access controls and allows import of internal vulnerability databases to meet requirements of FSTEC Order No. 117, Order No. 21, GOST R 56939-2024, and Federal Law No. 152.

By confirming vulnerabilities before blocking pipelines and by providing reproducible evidence rather than raw alerts, INFERA AI.SafeCode enables development velocity while preventing uncontrolled growth of technical and security debt.

Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest

More in Vulnerabilities & Exploits

Telegram for Android Patches Voice Call Vulnerability Enabling Code Execution
Yandex Patches Millions of Stations After eMudhra Certificate Keys Compromised
Cisco ASA and FTD Face DoS Vulnerability in SSL VPN Already Exploited in the Wild