Adding humorous or informal comments to bank transfers can lead to unexpected compliance reviews, according to lawyer Meri Valishvili. Phrases such as “bribe,” “kickback,” or “to the common pot” may be flagged by automated monitoring systems even when the sender intends only a joke.
Valishvili, a lecturer at Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, explained to RIA Novosti that banks’ algorithms analyze text literally and are not required to interpret context or humor. There is no publicly available universal list of risky words; each institution sets its own detection rules and keeps the full criteria confidential.
Everyday comments can also attract attention. Descriptions such as “for manicure,” “utilities payment,” or “under the contract” are not prohibited, yet repeated transfers of identical amounts combined with these notes may form a suspicious pattern for compliance teams.
For ordinary private transfers, Valishvili recommends omitting any extra commentary. When a payment has legal weight, she advises including precise document details such as the contract number and date. Group collections should use dedicated bank tools that explicitly state the purpose of the funds.
The key takeaway is to state the factual purpose of the payment without ambiguous or playful additions. While a friend may appreciate the joke, the bank’s compliance department may require additional explanations afterward.
